{"id":9664,"date":"2023-04-13T23:21:36","date_gmt":"2023-04-13T23:21:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/u-s-supreme-court-wont\/"},"modified":"2023-04-13T23:24:07","modified_gmt":"2023-04-13T23:24:07","slug":"u-s-supreme-court-wont","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/u-s-supreme-court-wont\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Supreme Court won&#8217;t halt $6 billion student debt settlement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By John Kruzel<\/p>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday refused to halt a legal settlement that would erase more than $6 billion in debt owed by former students of colleges &#8211; many of them for-profit institutions &#8211; who have said they were misled by schools about academics and job prospects.<\/p>\n<p>The justices turned away a request from three colleges that are challenging a settlement between the U.S. Education Department and borrowers that linked the colleges to claims of &#8220;substantial misconduct,&#8221; an allegation they dispute.<\/p>\n<p>Three of the schools identified in the settlement &#8211; for-profit Lincoln Educational Services Corp and American National University Inc as well as nonprofit Everglades College Inc &#8211; challenged the agreement after it was approved by a federal judge in California last November. Around 3,500 borrowers entitled to automatic loan discharge under the settlement attended one of the three schools.<\/p>\n<p>The decision was separate from a case pending before the high court over the legality of President Joe Biden&#8217;s plan to cancel $430 billion in student debt for about 40 million borrowers. A ruling in that case is expected by the end of June.<\/p>\n<p>The latest dispute stemmed from a class-action settlement under which the Education Department would automatically cancel the debt of nearly 200,000 borrowers who attended 151 schools.<\/p>\n<p>The schools have been accused of boosting enrollment through aggressive sales tactics as well as misrepresentations about the quality of their academic offerings, graduates&#8217; career prospects and networking opportunities, according to Eileen Connor, director of litigation at the Project on Predatory Student Lending, a group that represents borrowers involved in the settlement.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Today&#8217;s swift and decisive action from the highest court should end, once and for all, any ongoing debate about the legitimacy of this settlement. The message is clear: the rights of student borrowers will not falter, even in the face of well-funded, overblown political attacks masquerading as legal argument,&#8221; Connor told Reuters.<\/p>\n<p>The three schools argued in court filings they had suffered reputational harm, comparing their inclusion on the settlement&#8217;s list of schools to being &#8220;branded with [a] scarlet letter.&#8221; They also argued the Biden administration lacked the legal authority to cancel the debt.<\/p>\n<p>The settlement arose from what initially was a legal effort by borrowers in 2019 to force then-Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who served under President Donald Trump, to resume the Education Department&#8217;s adjudication of their misconduct claims against the schools. After three years of litigation and a change in presidential administrations, the parties reached a settlement in June 2022.<\/p>\n<p>California-based U.S. District Judge William Alsup approved the settlement last year and in February rejected the objections raised by the three colleges. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in March denied the bid by the three schools to block the settlement from taking effect while their appeal proceeds.<\/p>\n<p>Twenty conservative-leaning U.S. states, led by Ohio, had asked the Supreme Court to grant the request by the schools to pause further loan discharges under the settlement.<\/p>\n<p>Around 78,000 borrowers had already received loan discharges by April 11, the Biden administration told the justices in a court filing.<\/p>\n<p>The administration declined comment and an attorney for the schools did not immediately respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n<p> (Reporting by John Kruzel in Washington; Editing by Will Dunham)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/u-s-supreme-court-wont\/file-photo-u-s-supreme-court-building-in-washington\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-content\/uploads\/Reuters_Direct_Media\/USOnlineReportDomesticNews\/tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ3C0TW-VIEWIMAGE.jpg\" alt=\"tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ3C0TW-VIEWIMAGE\"><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By John Kruzel WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday refused to halt a legal settlement that would erase more than $6 billion in debt owed by former students of colleges &#8211; many of them for-profit institutions &#8211; who have said they were misled by schools about academics and job prospects. The justices turned [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":9665,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1214],"tags":[1223],"class_list":["post-9664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-u-s-domestic","tag-updated"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-content\/uploads\/Reuters_Direct_Media\/USOnlineReportDomesticNews\/tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ3C0TW-VIEWIMAGE.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9664"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9664\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9699,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9664\/revisions\/9699"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9665"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}