{"id":16431,"date":"2023-04-19T17:17:42","date_gmt":"2023-04-19T17:17:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/amgen-wins-appeal-in\/"},"modified":"2023-04-19T17:18:32","modified_gmt":"2023-04-19T17:18:32","slug":"amgen-wins-appeal-in","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/amgen-wins-appeal-in\/","title":{"rendered":"Amgen wins appeal in US patent case over generic psoriasis drugs"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>(Reuters) &#8211;     Amgen Inc convinced a U.S. appeals court on Wednesday to uphold patents that barred generic versions of its blockbuster psoriasis drug Otezla proposed by Zydus Pharmaceuticals and Novartis&#8217; Sandoz Inc.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a New Jersey federal court&#8217;s ruling that Amgen patents covering the drug were valid and that the proposed generics would infringe them.<\/p>\n<p>The ruling blocks proposed Otezla generics until 2028. The Federal Circuit also upheld a decision to invalidate one of Amgen&#8217;s patents that Sandoz said would have barred its generics until 2034.<\/p>\n<p>A spokesperson for Sandoz said Wednesday that the company was pleased with the decision allowing for Otezla generics in 2028 instead of 2034.<\/p>\n<p>Representatives for Amgen and Zydus did not immediately respond to requests for comment.<\/p>\n<p>Thousand Oaks, California-based Amgen sold over $2.2 billion worth of Otezla worldwide last year, according to a company filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.<\/p>\n<p>Amgen bought Otezla from Celgene Corp in 2019 for $13.4 billion. Celgene sued several drugmakers over their proposed Otezla generics starting in 2018, and 17 of the 19 lawsuits have been settled since. <\/p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp said in 2021 that Switzerland-based Sandoz and India-based Zydus&#8217; generics would infringe three Amgen patents.<\/p>\n<p>Zydus and Sandoz appealed the decision that two of the infringed patents were valid. The Federal Circuit on Wednesday affirmed the ruling.<\/p>\n<p>The court also affirmed that Amgen&#8217;s patent that would have expired in 2034 was invalid over Amgen&#8217;s cross-appeal.<\/p>\n<p>The case is Amgen Inc v. Sandoz Inc, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Nos. 22-1147 and 22-1149.<\/p>\n<p \/>\n<p> (Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/amgen-wins-appeal-in\/file-photo-an-amgen-sign-is-seen-at-the-companys\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-content\/uploads\/Reuters_Direct_Media\/USOnlineReportBusinessNews\/tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ3I0PN-VIEWIMAGE.jpg\" alt=\"tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ3I0PN-VIEWIMAGE\"><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Reuters) &#8211; Amgen Inc convinced a U.S. appeals court on Wednesday to uphold patents that barred generic versions of its blockbuster psoriasis drug Otezla proposed by Zydus Pharmaceuticals and Novartis&#8217; Sandoz Inc. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a New Jersey federal court&#8217;s ruling that Amgen patents covering the drug were [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":16432,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1213],"tags":[1223],"class_list":["post-16431","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-u-s-business","tag-updated"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-content\/uploads\/Reuters_Direct_Media\/USOnlineReportBusinessNews\/tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ3I0PN-VIEWIMAGE.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16431","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16431"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16431\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16433,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16431\/revisions\/16433"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16432"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16431"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16431"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lynettelockhart.com\/client\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16431"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}